The counsel for the petitioners argued that the said levy was in the nature of double taxation and ought to be struck down. Dismissing the petitions, the court observed that no provision of the Constitution has been cited or referred to in the instant case by the counsel for the petitioners, which would compel this court to hold that super tax was unconstitutional.
The counsel for the petitioners argued that the said levy was in the nature of double taxation and ought to be struck down. Dismissing the petitions, the court observed that no provision of the Constitution has been cited or referred to in the instant case by the counsel for the petitioners, which would compel this court to hold that super tax was unconstitutional.